Four sits further down the market cap rankings at #270, which weighs on the fundamentals score relative to more dominant names in the token category. Four has no protocol or chain reporting fees or value secured, so on-chain health rests on turnover: 24h volume at roughly 3.6% of market cap. That is thin, which can mean wider spreads and choppier price action.
Momentum has cooled, with price down -10.4% over the trailing 7 days. The risk pillar is holding up, with a typical daily move of about 5.4% over the past week rather than the kind of price action that signals stress.
The composite grade of D puts Four at the 11th percentile of the rated universe on a weighted blend of fundamentals (35%), on-chain health (25%), momentum (20%), and inverted risk (20%). See the Methodology page for how each pillar is defined.
Every Antelux grade is mechanical: no analyst overrides. Each pillar below shows the exact measured input, and its score is a percentile rank against the other rated coins on that measure, so 90 means it beats 90% of the universe rather than scoring 90 out of 100. Full methodology, weightings, and grade bands are on the Methodology page.
Blends market standing with tokenomics. Rank #270 caps the sub-score, and with 66% of max supply already circulating, meaningful future emission still lies ahead.
The composite score recorded for Four at the end of each day. Because the score is a percentile rank within the rated universe, a flat line means Four held its place relative to everything else, not that nothing happened to it.