MetaDAO sits further down the market cap rankings at #240, which weighs on the fundamentals score relative to more dominant names in the token category. On-chain health is measured on fee revenue, value secured, turnover: $3k in fees over 24h (0.71% annualised against market cap), and $14.1M of value secured (10% of market cap), and 24h volume at 1.3% of market cap. That trails the rest of the rated universe, meaning the market is valuing it ahead of its measured usage.
Momentum has been constructive lately, with price up +7.2% over the trailing 7 days. The risk pillar is being pulled down by genuine volatility: a typical day moves MetaDAO about 10.2%, measured across the past week. That is worth understanding before treating the composite grade as the full picture.
The composite grade of C puts MetaDAO at the 31st percentile of the rated universe on a weighted blend of fundamentals (35%), on-chain health (25%), momentum (20%), and inverted risk (20%). See the Methodology page for how each pillar is defined.
Every Antelux grade is mechanical: no analyst overrides. Each pillar below shows the exact measured input, and its score is a percentile rank against the other rated coins on that measure, so 90 means it beats 90% of the universe rather than scoring 90 out of 100. Full methodology, weightings, and grade bands are on the Methodology page.
Blends market standing with tokenomics. Rank #240 caps the sub-score; with no supply cap, emission policy is scored neutrally with a slight caution.
The composite score recorded for MetaDAO at the end of each day. Because the score is a percentile rank within the rated universe, a flat line means MetaDAO held its place relative to everything else, not that nothing happened to it.