Maple Finance sits further down the market cap rankings at #167, which weighs on the fundamentals score relative to more dominant names in the token category. On-chain health is measured on fee revenue, value secured, turnover: $207k in fees over 24h (40.4% annualised against market cap), and $2.4B of value secured (13.0x its market cap), and 24h volume at 4.0% of market cap. That compares favourably against the rest of the rated universe.
Momentum has been constructive lately, with price up +6.8% over the trailing 7 days. The risk pillar is holding up reasonably well, with 24h price action of +5.2% that doesn't suggest acute stress.
The composite grade of B+ puts Maple Finance at the 85th percentile of the rated universe on a weighted blend of fundamentals (35%), on-chain health (25%), momentum (20%), and inverted risk (20%). See the Methodology page for how each pillar is defined.
Every Antelux grade is mechanical: no analyst overrides. Each pillar below shows the exact measured input, and its score is a percentile rank against the other rated coins on that measure, so 90 means it beats 90% of the universe rather than scoring 90 out of 100. Full methodology, weightings, and grade bands are on the Methodology page.
Blends market standing with tokenomics. Rank #167 caps the sub-score; with no supply cap, emission policy is scored neutrally with a slight caution.
The composite score recorded for Maple Finance at the end of each day. Because the score is a percentile rank within the rated universe, a flat line means Maple Finance held its place relative to everything else, not that nothing happened to it.